Unhappy Hour

I’ve been dealing with a lot of different local bars over the past few months in working for the magazine.  Everyone’s got their own idea for a Happy Hour – some time of day or week when food or drink are half-off  or somehow otherwise discounted for the prudent customer’s convenience.  I’ve seen some with a very obscure, particular hour that I don’t think anyone has any chance of making.  And then I’ve seen some where the hours are happier more often than not.

You guys I’m sure know by now that I draw a lot of inspiration from Seth Godin, whose big thing (or, one of his many) is being remarkable.

Tying it all together: I’d love to see a bar with an “Unhappy Hour.”  Good deals on drinks all the time, except if you’re there from 7pm-8pm, you pay four times as much.  Do some over-the-top advertisements: “Don’t come during Unhappy Hour!  Everything’s super expensive!  You’ll have the worst time ever, but only for a limited time!”  Perhaps you could even reward your brazen patrons for throwing caution (and cash) to the wind with a free T-shirt or giveaway if they buy during unhappy hour.

Might not make sense, might do more harm than good to the bar’s overall rep and brand.  But I bet you’d definitely find people start talking about you.

How I’d Fix the Hair Salon

I got a haircut on Sunday.  It was terribly overdue.  But in doing so, I came up with a few ideas on how to make the haircutting experience better.

Truth be told, I love getting my hair cut (straight-razor shaves are great, too!).  Probably because I wait so long in-between trims that I’ll end up shedding half a pound of hair before walking out the door.  But there’s one thing I don’t like – that, upon departure, I’ll be covered in tiny bits of cut hair.  Worse still, the stylist just put gel in to set me up for the day.

In practice, you can easily (and quite obviously) remedy this by going home and showering.  But why?  If you go to a hair salon that’s posh enough to wash and shampoo your hair before the cut, why not send you back for another round afterward so that I’m not covered in prickly hairs?

A hair salon is a two-service business.  On the one hand, it’s a physical service: I walk in, pay you, and walk out with less hair.  On the other, it’s an emotional service: I walk in, pay you, and walk out feeling like a million bucks.  Does a $60 haircut cut four times as much hair as a $15 haircut?  No.  Does it cut four times as precisely?  Maybe.  Do I walk out of the salon feeling four times as confident and handsome?  Better hope so.

There’s a reason why most elite hair salons will wash you hair before sending you to the stylist: damp hair is easier to cut.  It makes the physical service better. But it makes the emotional service better, too – clients are treated like royalty, and receive a nice head massage.  That’s something entirely separate from the actual haircut.

Now consider if the salon added a second wash, just before being sent on your way.  1) Does this add to the physical product?  Maybe.  Perhaps after clearing out some clumps of hair, the stylist can be more positive that everything is trimmed evenly.  But it also takes more time to finish the service, and clients’ time may be even more valuable than their dollars.  2) Does this add to the emotional product?  I’d say yes.  If the stylist makes the purpose of the second wash very clear (wash away all the stray hair bits), I’d happily oblige.  I might even become more brand loyal, after thinking back to other haircut experiences in a less positive light.

///

The second change is something that’s already being employed, and I just feel more people and salons should know about or use themselves.  The haircut place I like to go is called A Cut Above the Rest, on Big Bend and Forest Park.  While I suppose the physical haircut is nothing special, the price is right ($15) and they offer something I’ve never seen anywhere else:  After every cut, the barber promises that if I decide I’d like something changed over the next few days, that I should just come right back in and he’ll fix it free of charge.

Of course, I bet you’d be hard-pressed to find a hair salon anywhere that wouldn’t practice this policy were the situation to arise, but that’s hardly the point.  The point is that they’ve managed to attach a warranty and return policy to an intangible product.  And it costs them nothing! Practically speaking, how likely are you to mull your haircut for four days, and decide it needs adjusting?  But how much happier am I going to feel about my cut knowing that I can get it fixed anytime?  Loads.  Psychologically speaking, even, the mere fact that I’ve decided not to go back for a fix will subconsciously align me more positively with the original cut.  And how often am I going to go back knowing that every time I buy I’ve got a return policy.  Once every three months or so (re: every time, if you’re not on a Josh haircut schedule).

///

All this differentiation, product enhancement, and benefits.  And I haven’t even said a word about scissors.  Goes to show you how many ways you can make your product unique, valuable, and awesome if you think a little outside the box.

This is probably the most feminine thing I’ve ever written.  To balance, Matt and I have been making our own home-cooked beef jerky over the past few days.  That’s probably the most manly thing I’ve ever concocted.  Fair?

Moral Hazard and the Draft

The concept of Moral Hazard was drilled into my head in a couple of business classes.  In essence:  given an incentive to lose, you’re more likely to engage in losing behavior.  Say, for example, your insurance company will cover your expenses if you break a bone.  Who’s more likely to try a crazy stunt on a motorcycle [or something way cuter] – you, or your uninsured counterpart?

I liked this quote from Malcolm Gladwell (author of Blink, Outliers, and The Tipping Point) in his recent conversation with Bill Simmons (author of awesome sports stuff).

I think, for example, that the idea of ranking draft picks in reverse order of finish — as much as it sounds “fair” — does untold damage to the game. You simply cannot have a system that rewards anyone, ever, for losing. Economists worry about this all the time, when they talk about “moral hazard.” …

…No economist in his right mind would ever endorse the football and basketball drafts the way they are structured now. They are a moral hazard in spades. If you give me a lottery pick for being an atrocious GM, where’s my incentive not to be an atrocious GM?

I love applying scholastic concepts to real-world situations.  Good luck trying that with a communications degree or something.

Point is this – the draft lottery has a very real, and very adverse effect on all sports employing the system.  There’s a very real fear that the Washington Nationals with two of the best baseball prospects we’ve seen in decades, in Stephen Strasburg and Bryce Harper.  Who’s to say that the Islanders didn’t let goalie Rick DiPietro sit out a few extra weeks months to ensure a better chance at drafting John Tavares?  Lose games, win a prize.

How do you eliminate moral hazard?  It’s impossible to axe completely.  You want parity in the league, so you give bad teams a chance to catch up by giving them the best prospects.  Then, teams tank and are rewarded.  You can’t give middle-of-the-road teams an equal shot, because fringe teams with low championship hopes might just lose enough to pass whatever metric you place in front of them.  You can’t give everyone an equal shot for the risk of giving the Lakers or Penguins unrivaled access to lock down a premium contributor for the next decade.

I wonder, what if we eliminated the draft? You still have salary caps to control parity in the leagues (the MLB is an exception, but still – the baseball draft has enough stupid holes in it that it doesn’t matter.  The Yankees can’t sign 50 rounds worth of players).  The best upcoming stars go to the teams that are run well and have the most money available.  John Tavares doesn’t necessarily go to the Penguins because they’ve got a ton of their cap space locked away to pay for Malkin and Crosby.  The Islanders can pay him more.  Rotten or extraneous franchises with stupid management or unprofitable locations like the LA Clippers, Florida Marlins, and Phoenix Coyotes either move, fire the guy in charge, or die, because they aren’t consistently rewarded with an influx of incredible talent.

You get a new dynamic in the league:  the Penguins stand pat because their team is already loaded with talent.  Maybe the Islanders want to make a run and snag the five best prospects on the board (if they can – remember, there’s a salary cap).  You get upstart young teams with lots of potential, and give fans a lot to root for.  And what’s most important, nobody has an excuse for losing games.

///

If you can’t tell, I’ve been watching a lot of sports (with ESPN.com open on my laptop) during my summer break.

A QuikTrip Campaign

This past Wednesday may have very well been the last time I get all hot and sweaty from playing roller hockey.

It was our last hockey practice of the season.  We’ve got regionals this weekend, but that means we are actually supposed to care about winning and as such will be playing the short rotation of 8 guys who are actually really good on our team.  One of them is Canadian, which I think gives him some kind of unfair advantage.  Like I could be that good, too, if I regularly abused performance enhancing drugs (or just grew up with a rink in my backyard.  Which I think is more likely his case).  I hope the league puts an asterisk next to all of his goals and assists.

One of our prized and cherished hockey traditions is going to Quik Trip after practice every Wednesday night.  For those uninitiated, Quik Trip is kind of like a 7-11, but with a Gas Station in the front and a white guy behind the counter.

Back in the days of yore, you could get a 52oz yellow Gatorade from the soda fountain for a scant $0.99.  Two bucks and you’d have chips and a drink for the ride home, and enough electrolytes in your system to do this move from Street Fighter II. Now the 52oz cup is like $1.29, and you can only get a 32oz-er for $0.99.  In this rare instance, I’m not a big fan of changeAlternative comment: Interesting how the price of Gatorade at Quik Trip has inflated more over four years than the price of the gasoline (minus, of course, last summer’s Bush-fueled extravaganza).

Speaking of change, here’s my other favorite thing about Quik Trip:  whenever your purchase total comes out to something like $1.97, the cashier will take your $2 bill, give you a nickel back in change, and say “thaaaaaaaanks have a good one.”   It’s not about making 2 cents on the deal every time.  Or about the fact that I’ve consistently been able to launder those afor-linked-to phony $2 bills there.  It’s about the fact that I don’t have to carry around pennies in my wallet. There are few worse feelings in the world than having to carry around 3 cents in change.   So I thank QT for their gesture of kindness.  And in the off occasion when my order totals $2.22, I’ll let them keep my change.  Generosity begets generosity, I suppose.

Here’s my idea for an awesome advertising campaign for Quik Trip: Abolish the penny. Don’t even bother carrying them in the cash registers.  Announce to the world that you’re not carrying pennies anymore.  Round up or round down on every purchase that comes down to a matter of cents. There’s certainly already a calling for this.

Is this legal? I don’t know, actually.  Could they get sued for false advertising if they say that a hotdog will cost $0.98 after taxes and then they charge someone a whole dollar?  Would someone be obnoxious enough to sue over this? I guess we’ve heard worse. Even if it is illegal, the campaign might still be massively effective. Here are a couple of examples that are popularly cited in marketing classes from video game company, Acclaim. (Remember NBA Jam? That was these guys):

  1. In the U.K., to promote racing game “Burnout 2,” Acclaim offered to pay for every speeding ticket in the country on the day of the game’s release.
  2. in 2002, to promote a game “Gladiator: Sword of Vengeance,” purportedly the bloodiest game of all time, Acclaim announced a “bloodvertising” campaign.  They intended put up posters and fliers that actually seeped a red, blood-like substance over the course of a week.

Both campaigns have obvious moral hazards, and neither of them ever actually went into effect.  As it turns out, Acclaim never actually intended for the campaigns to be executed.   Consider the massive free publicity they received from every single newspaper and website that ran a piece on the “obscene” ad campaigns.  Huge wins.  (By the way, you can read up on a few other entertaining guerrilla marketing campaigns here.)

So that’s the deal.  Quik Trip announces they’re abandoning the penny, newspapers say “what the hell?!”, the insiders chuckle, and everyone’s stopping by Quik Trip to see what all the hubbub is about.

You can thank me by bringing the price back down on my beloved 52oz.

The Pizza is smarter than the Post

Maybe it’s because I’m gen-Y, internet-savvy, all-about-about-the-emails.  I just can’t figure out why receiving snail mail is so difficult.

From my understanding of the situation:  I’m set to receive a package.  The delivery man shows up at my door, notices that I’m not sitting out my my front porch waiting specifically for his arrival (I imagine I’d be playing with one of those paddle-ball things that I’ve never been able to figure out, either), and then turns around and leaves, hoping tomorrow will bring greener pastures.  I’m not even sure if he rings the doorbell.

Even more befuddling is the fact that I live with seven other guys (and three girls, too, technically), all of whom are of-age and should be able to sign for a package in  my leave.  And on multiple occasions, they’ve been denied the privilege.

So I’ll call UPS or Fed Ex and explain the situation.  I’ll ask, “Can you give me an approximate time when the package will come?”  Hmmm…that’s going to be a problem. “Can you have the package delivered just any time before 10:30?” I’ll try, but the problem is I have to call the delivery center, and they have to call the delivery man, and he might already have his route figured out, he might be on his way, or he might be busy porking some single, desparate housewives and we won’t be able to get in touch with him.  But thanks for choosing Fed Ex! Is there anything else I’d be unable to help you with today?

Then there’s the tracking number, which lets me look up my package’s progress online from warehouse to the nearest distribution center, then to delivery truck, then to nearest distribution center again, then to delivery truck, and then to nearest distribution center again.  It’d be great if I was worried about my box of trinkets getting intercepted by armored bandits on a train out in the Midwest, but I’m pretty sure that that only happens in the 1800’s or in space-future.

How do normal people, working full-time plus overtime much like myself, living alone, ever receive a package??

Here’s how Pointers, the local delicious pizza place, solves the problem.  When I place my order, they give me an approximate time of when the pie will arrive.  The delivery guy doesn’t even need to ring the doorbell when he shows up – he calls my cell phone and says “Pizza’s here!”  I drop everything, get to the door, easy exchange.

There’s no neuroscience here.  My cell phone is attached to my hipCALL ME!

If his route is already figured out, why can’t he call me at the beginning of the day and say “Hey, I just planned my route for the day, it looks like I’m going to be at your place at around 11:30 am.  Is that okay?”  And then, why doesn’t he call me again as he leaves the house prior to mine to confirm?

Let’s get real science-y.  Why not give me the delivery guy’s direct cell number?  What if they equipped their trucks with GPS systems (I’m sure they already do), and let me track the truck’s progress or proximity in real-time?

Nobody wins when I have to fight through layers of bureaucracy to maybe get the time of my delivery changed, or when the delivery guy shows up and can’t deliver my package.  He’s got to come again tomorrow, the company would lose my business if there was any reasonably sane alternative, and I have to get annoyed and write blog posts instead of being productive and reading my GMAT prep book.

How I’d fix Pantene

I burned some study time productively the other day and flipped through some recent articles posted on BrandWeek.  I came across this one in particular, and felt that I had something constructive to say about it.

The article itself is fairly boring; I wouldn’t bother reading it if I were you.  Basically the idea in the article is that P&G is struggling to sell its shampoo line, Pantene.  They’re throwing some hundred million dollars into a new ad campaign that will tout better quality, stronger hair, or something, and will feature some pretty girl with glossy hair in the commercials.  Pricing and positioning stays the same, though.  According to the article, Pantene’s position is “a value buy that’s just as good as salon brands, but less expensive.”

I guess they think that will work.  I don’t see the logic or the niche behind a “value” brand that’s the most expensive of all the value products.  But I suppose I’m maybe not the target market here.

Why am I writing about a women’s shampoo product, then?

I actually never suspected that Pantene was in trouble as a brand.  Truth is, I’m a longtime Pantene user – not that I’ve ever bought the stuff myself.  All through growing up, I left the shampoo decision making to my mom and sister.  So there’d always be a bottle of Pantene in the shower, next to  some old bottle of slum-poo.  Figuring my sister had better knowledge on the benefits of hair care products than I, I’d always use her shampoo instead of my own.  (I wonder if my mom ever picked up on the fact that my sister was eating through her shampoo about 100 times faster than I was.)

Do any of you guys do this?

Anyway, here’s the point:  Pantene (or some shampoo company) should do something unique and remarkable, and drop a new advertising campaign as “The shampoo product your hip sister uses.”  Here’s what follows:

  1. Girls want the shampoo because the ads subtly/overtly convey that the female users are “hip”
  2. Guys want the shampoo because it’s what the hip girls are into, and because they see it’s okay for guys to be doing it
  3. It’s a unique brand position, and there’s no confusing “premium but value” logic required

Granted, there are a lot of other things to consider.  I’m not terribly positive that Pantene’s current target demographic would adhere well to the new campaign.  It’s a big risk to take.  But then again, maybe it’s time for them to jump ship anyway.

Frustration-Free Packaging

Well hell, it’s about time somebody did this.  From Amazon,

So long, blisterpack.

So long, blisterpack.

The blisterpack, ironically, was implemented with the purpose of making packages ridiculously difficult to open.  Blame guys like Best Buy, who like to make cutesy little devices that cost over a hundred dollars but you can fit them in your back pocket once they’re out of the pack.  I think I still have a small scar on my left hand from when I wanted to use my brand new laptop mouse but the packaging had different feelings.

Good for Amazon for realizing “uh, no, people aren’t stealing our crap this is stupid”, and getting rid of all the packaging garbage.  And they’re even cutting costs in doing this.  Everybody wins, except maybe the Band-Aid companies.

Travel Notes

I had been planning on writing a thing on travel notes, and then Seth Godin wrote about his travel thoughts today, too. My favorites among his thoughts:

  • “Why doesn’t the airport have sleeping benches? Worse, far worse, why isn’t there someone you can ask that question to?”
  • “After inspecting more than twenty million pairs of shoes, have the screeners found even one dangerous pair?”
  • “If it’s so dangerous to have your ipod on during takeoff and landing, how come you’re allowed to have it with you on the plane at all? Does all the scolding actually increase safety? How?”
  • “Why does the FAA require the airlines to explain to every passenger how to buckle their seatbelt? Don’t people who have managed to safely get to the airport but have never mastered this skill deserve whatever happens to them?”

Read the whole thing here.

Of course, my personal view on the matter is that the whole airport security thing is a sham designed to convey a feeling of security, rather than actually providing any. Which is why they still check people’s shoes, sweaters, and 20oz. soda bottles. And it’s why I’ve managed to sneak things like 20oz. soda bottles, pocket knives, and metal umbrellas onto flights. But that’s besides the point.

I’ve been looking into doing some serious amounts of traveling this year, and have plenty of experience from last semester. So here are some tips for you guys:

  1. In Europe, for reasons I can’t begin to explain, flying is the cheapest and most manageable form of travel. Aggregator skyscanner.net looks across all the major cheap flight sites, and finds the best deals. I’ve found tickets as low as $6 flat, for an inter-country flight. If any of you know of a semi-equivalent for this side of the Atlantic, please please please let me know.
  2. From limited experience, the bus system seems to be the cheapest and most manageable form of travel in the US. Greyhound and Megabus I think are the best; they’ve taken me round-trip between Chicago and St. Louis for $36. Though I’m supposing that this gets less and less manageable as you start moving farther apart – 6 hours from Chicago to St. Louis I can handle, 23 from St. Louis to New York might be tougher. But still, I wonder if it’s $300-saved-from-direct-flight-and-baggage-checks tougher.
  3. I’m a HUGE proponent of staying in hostels in Europe.  There are a bunch of aggregate sites if you browse through Google.  Even if it’s a hotel, I’d recommend finding the place on an aggregator and then calling them directly for a rate, to cut out the middle man and save you a couple bucks.  But the best might be couch surfing – it’s free, assuming you can handle a couch for the night / your stay. That depends on what kind of traveler you are, and what traveling you’re doing.
  4. Traveling in 3’s doesn’t work.  It’s a bad dynamic.  If you’re by yourself and want to do something, you do it.  If you’re in a pair, you can go together or split up if necessary.  If you’re in a quad, you can split up.  But the three inherently isolates one person, almost unavoidably.  So avoid it.

Places I’m looking to travel in the next six months:  Chicago, Kentucky, Connecticut, Israel, Tennessee, and I guess New York (if I have the time).

I was thinking about Soup

I really like soup.  I ought to pick some up the next time I go to the supermarket.

I had an idea though.  One thing I kind of don’t like about soup is how there’s always that little bit at the end of the bowl that you can’t pick up with your spoon, and you either have to drink from the bowl or if you’re in a kind of a place you just have to let it go.

Here’s what they should do:  make a soup bowl that’s got a little spoon-shaped indenture at the bottom, where you can rest your spoon and shimmy the rest of the soup in.  Think about it.  It’d be good for cereal too.

Something I hate

When you go to a website to find their address, and there’s a button or a tab that says “Contact Us,” but instead of taking you to a page with their mailing address, email address, and other assorted contact information, it automatically opens a window in Microsoft Outlook for you.

It’s 6 seconds for me to type anyone’s email address in the “To:” bar that this system I guess is trying to save me.  Minus the minute and a half that the computer dies while it’s trying to load Outlook.  What a crock of phooey that is.

What if, when you clicked my contact page, your cellphone would automatically dial a call to me?  Wouldn’t that suck?  This sucks too.  So cut it out already.